Breach Of Contracts

Unit 5 Assignment Kaplan University In the case of Ms. Charlize Theron vs bide ecclesiastic Raymond Weil we atomic number 18 to discuss three items, how the contract amongst these twain people was allegedly breached, what defenses may be uncommitted to the defendant, and what animate may be available to the plaintiff. The head start doubtfulness I willing address is how exactly the contract was breached. Mrs. Theron write a contract with the watch maker Mr. Weil stating that from October 2005 through celestial latitude 2006 she would only relegate Weils high-end watches. But in fact she was tiring the competitions watches as good as Weils. Now this would be considered a breach nevertheless after reading the article some(prenominal) times it tell she was non allowed to represent any other jewellery maker in advertisements. Mrs. Theron what not endorsing other deals she was simply take over another(prenominal) watch while promoting a perfume line. This I cleart think is a breach of contract and she wasnt appearing for any jewelry or watch company. The minute brain what defenses are available to Mrs. Theron? The only defense in reality Mrs. Theron can approach and use is a dipment.

To settle bug out of court would be her best attend as she does not want a bad word picture put upon her for impuissance to abide by contracts she had signed, The final question what remedy may be available to the plaintiff. There are actually devil that may be available the first remedy would be to receive all watches back that were supposititious to be wear by Mrs. Th eron. The second is to accept the gag rule ! or represent to a settlement so neither party will have to go to court. References Miller, R. L. & Jentz, G. A. (2010). bedrock of business integrity: Summarized cases, (8th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage LearningIf you want to get a full moon essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper